"AJSH & Co LLP"    is now    "Mercurius & Associates LLP" "AJSH & Co LLP"    is now    "Mercurius & Associates LLP" "AJSH & Co LLP"    is now    "Mercurius & Associates LLP"

Transfer Pricing in India: Rules, Strategies, and Compliance

images
images
transfer pricing Blog banner

Transfer Pricing regulations have gained significant attention due to the rise in disputes from multinational companies’ tax strategies in India. What adds to the controversy and intrigue is how regulators perceive these strategies as intentionally structured to leverage advantages such as comparable labor costs and tax benefits, potentially at the expense of a country’s tax revenues. Therefore, it was necessary to establish a consistent and globally accepted framework for determining fair and equitable profits and taxes for such multinational enterprises operating in India.

Transfer Pricing Rules and Regulations In India

Sections 92 to 92F of the Indian Income Tax Act 1961 specifically address transfer pricing, covering both intra-group cross-border and specified domestic transactions. Since its implementation, this code has made transfer pricing the primary international tax issue affecting multinational enterprises in India. These regulations draw heavily from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) Guidelines, detailing various transfer pricing methodologies, mandating extensive annual documentation requirements, and imposing severe penalties for non-adherence.

The Indian Transfer Pricing Code mandates that income generated from international transactions or specified domestic transactions between associated enterprises must be calculated based on the arm’s length price. It is specified that any deduction for an expenditure, interest, or allocation of cost or expense arising from such transactions should also be determined in accordance with the arm’s length price. The Act provides definitions for terms like international transactions, specified domestic transactions, associated enterprises, and arm’s length price.

The Type of Transactions Covered

Indian transfer pricing regulations apply to international and specified domestic transactions between associated enterprises. An “international transaction” is a transaction involving the sale, purchase, or lease of tangible or intangible property; provision of services; cost-sharing arrangements; lending or borrowing of money; or any other transaction affecting the profits, income, losses, or assets of such enterprises. It also includes mutual agreements between enterprises for the allocation, apportionment, or contribution to any cost or expense related to a benefit or service provided or to be provided to one or more of those enterprises.

Further, the transfer pricing regulations are also applicable to “specified domestic transactions” if the transactions fall in any of the seven clauses of section 92BA, if the aggregate of all transactions entered into by the assessee covered by all seven clauses of section 92BA in the previous year exceeds ₹20 crores:

  • Any transaction referred to in section 80A
  • Any transaction related to businesses eligible for profit-linked tax incentives, for example, infrastructure facilities (Section 80-IA) and SEZ units (section 10AA) and
  • Any business transacted between the persons referred to in section 115BAB, section 115BAE, and section 10AA.
  • Any other transactions as may be specified.

Hence, the SDT provisions are applicable if any of the domestic Indian entities engaged in the inter-company transaction benefit from a tax holiday or profit-linked deduction provided that the aggregate value of such transactions exceeds INR 20 crores.

Section Taxpayers Covered Deduction
10AA Persons with income from SEZ units 100% of the profit coming from export is entitled to a tax deduction for the first 5 consecutive years (1st to 5th year).

50% of the export profit is entitled to a deduction for the next 5 years (6th to 10th year).

50% of Export Profits (or) the amount credited to the SEZ Reinvestment Allowance reserve, whichever is lower (11th to 15th year)

80-IA Infrastructure developers 100% of the profits for a period of 10 consecutive assessment years out of 15/20 years, as the case may be from the date of commencement of operation.
80-IA Telecommunication service providers 100% of the profits for a period of the first 5 assessment years, 30% for the next 5 years out of 15 years from the date of commencement of operations.
80-IA Developers of Industrial Park 100% of the profits for a period of 10 consecutive A.Y. out of 15 years from the date of commencement of operations.
80-IA Producers or distributors of power 100% of the profits for a period of 10 consecutive A.Y. out of 15 years from the date of commencement of operations.

Associated Enterprises (“AEs”)

The relationship of associated enterprises encompasses direct or indirect involvement in the management, control, or capital of one enterprise by another. It also includes scenarios where the same person, directly or indirectly, has involvement in the management, control, or capital of both enterprises. The section specifies criteria that establish when two enterprises are considered associated enterprises for this definition.

Arm’s Length Principle and Pricing Methodologies

Section 92F of the Act defines ‘arm’s length price’ as the price applied in transactions between non-associated enterprises under uncontrolled conditions. Section 92C of the Act prescribes the following methods for determining the arm’s-length price:

  • Comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method: This method is applied when similar transaction(s) occur between unconnected parties.
  • Resale price method (RPM): This method is applied when an item obtained from an associated enterprise is subsequently sold to an unrelated party.
  • Cost-plus method (CPM): This method is typically applied when semi-finished goods are sold to associated enterprises.
  • Profit split method (PSM): This method is applied in situations involving the transfer of unique intangibles, multiple international transactions, or specified domestic transactions.
  • Transactional net margin method (TNMM): Compute the Net Profit (NP) margin of the enterprise from international transactions or specified domestic transactions with associated enterprises, taking into account the costs incurred, sales generated, and assets employed.

Such other methods, as may be prescribed under Rule 10AB, allow for any method that best suits the facts and circumstances of the transaction.

These regulations mandate that taxpayers determine an arm’s length price for international transactions or specified domestic transactions. Transfer pricing aims to ensure fair arm’s length pricing and prevent profit shifting. The ultimate goal is to determine taxable income accurately. If the arm’s length price genuinely results in lower taxable income, it should still be applied.

Determination of Arm’s Length Price Using One of the Above Methods

  • Arithmetic mean concept: In transfer pricing, when multiple prices are determined using the most appropriate method, the arm’s length price is usually calculated as the arithmetic mean of these prices. This method ensures fairness and consistency by averaging the different prices derived from various methods, offering a balanced and representative estimate of the arm’s length price for the related party transaction.

If the difference between the arm’s length price determined and the actual price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction was conducted does not exceed a percentage, not exceeding three percent of the latter, as notified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette, then the price at which the transaction was actually undertaken will be considered as the arm’s length price.

  • Range concept: The salient features of Rule 10CA dealing with range concept are as follows:
    1. The “Range” concept is applicable primarily when using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM), Resale Price Method (RPM), or Cost Plus Method (CPM) to determine the arm’s length price (ALP); it can also be considered for other methods if justified.
    2. The following steps would be required to construct the range:—
      1. At least six entities must be chosen as comparable entities for the tested party, selected based on the similarity of their functions, assets, and risks (FAR) with those of the tested party;
      2. The 3-year data of these 6 entities (or more) will be considered, and the weighted average of this 3-year data from each company will be used to construct the dataset. In certain cases, data from 2 out of the 3 years may also be considered. This ensures that the dataset comprises at least 6 data points;
      3. To calculate the weighted average, the numerator and denominator of the selected Profit Level Indicator (PLI) will be aggregated across all years for each comparable entity. Subsequently, the margin will be computed based on these aggregated figures.
      4. The range would consist of data points that fall within the 35th to 65th percentile of the dataset or series.
    3. If the transfer price of the tested party falls outside the range constructed above, the median of the range would be taken as ALP, and an adjustment to the transfer price would be made. If the transfer price is within the range, no adjustment shall be made. There shall not be 2 different data sets – one for testing and one for making adjustments.
    4. In scenarios where the ‘range’ concept is not applicable, the arithmetic mean concept will continue to be used along with the benefit of the tolerance range. Moreover, whether the ‘range’ concept or arithmetic mean is used to determine the arm’s length price (ALP) with multiple-year data, the same principles apply. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the multiple-year data of comparables will be considered for computing the ALP in such cases.

In recent years, there has been a rise in transfer pricing audits and the adoption of assertive stances by the Indian Revenue Authority, leading to prolonged and complex legal disputes. The Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) program aims to mitigate conflicts arising from audits and foster better communication between taxpayers and the Indian Revenue Authority. By facilitating early agreement on pertinent facts and circumstances, the APA program aims to enhance efficiency and clarity for both parties involved.

Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)

An Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) is a formal agreement between the CBDT and a taxpayer that establishes the arm’s length price (ALP) for an international transaction in advance or outlines the method for determining the ALP. Once an APA is signed for an international transaction, the ALP for that transaction during the specified period covered by the APA will be determined exclusively according to the terms of the APA. Participation in the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) process is voluntary. It serves as a complement to other mechanisms, such as appeals and Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA), for resolving transfer pricing disputes. APAs are typically valid for a maximum period of 5 years.

Terms of an APA:

  • Transactions covered by an APA
  • Transfer pricing method (TPM)
  • Determination of ALP
  • Critical assumptions regarding future events
  • Roll back provisions

Any other conditions, if any

Types of APA

  • Unilateral: An APA between a taxpayer and the tax administration of the country where it is subject to taxation.
  • Bilateral: An agreement between the CBDT (Central Board of Direct Taxes) and an applicant, established subsequent to and based on any agreement outlined in Rule 44GA between India’s competent authority and the competent authority of another country concerning the appropriate transfer pricing method or the arm’s length price.
  • Multilateral: An agreement between the Board (CBDT) and the applicant, subsequent to, and based on, any agreement referred to in Rule 44GA between the competent authority in India and the competent authority in the other countries regarding the most appropriate transfer pricing method or the arm’s length price.

* The decision to choose a particular type of APA rests with the applicant at the time of application submission.

Key Benefits of an APA

  • An APA provides certainty on transfer pricing and the TPM to be adopted for intercompany transactions covered under the agreement.
  • The certainty with regard to the tax outcome of the taxpayer’s international transactions.
  • A bilateral or multilateral APA also wipes out the risk of potential double taxation arising from controlled transactions.
  • Removal of an audit threat and deliverance of a particular tax outcome based on the terms of the agreement.
  • Substantial reduction in risk and cost associated with audits and appeals over the APA term.
  • For tax authorities, an APA reduces the cost of administration and also provides additional resources.
  • APA renewal provides an excellent leverage of time and efforts expended during negotiating the original APA. The Indian APA rules also allow the taxpayer to convert a unilateral into a bilateral and vice-versa if required.

Therefore, APAs offer a mutually beneficial situation for all the stakeholders involved.

The APA Process in India:

Following the APA processes in other countries worldwide, the Indian APA rules outline a process that consists of the following four phases:

  • Pre-filing consultation: The process for APA would start with a pre-filing consultation meeting. The taxpayer has the opportunity to request a pre-filing consultation meeting, which is intended to determine the scope of the agreement, understand the transfer pricing issues involved, and assess the suitability of international transactions for an APA. The taxpayer also has the option of applying for a pre-filing consultation on an anonymous basis. This process is non-binding to the taxpayers and the revenue. The taxpayer is required to fill out the form (From No. 3CEC) for a pre-filing consultation. It is vital not only to the APA process but also to determine the course of the APA.
  • Formal APA application: After the pre-filing meeting, if the taxpayer is desirous of applying for an APA, an application would be required to be made in the prescribed form (Form No. 3CED) containing specified information. The APA application filing fee is also payable at this stage.
    An application shall be made in Form No. 3CED, which shall be furnished to the:-

    1. DGIT (International Taxation) – in case of unilateral agreement; and
    2. The competent authority in India – in case of bilateral or multilateral agreement.
  • Negotiation: Once the application is accepted, the APA team shall hold meetings with the applicant and undertake necessary inquiries relating to the case. After the discussion and inquiries, the APA team shall prepare a draft report, which shall be provided to the Competent Authority (for bilateral/multilateral APA) or DGIT (for unilateral APA).
  • Finalization: This phase involves exchanging feedback on the draft APA, finalizing the APA, and giving effect to the initial years covered under the APA term that have already elapsed.

Statutory Fee for Filing an APA Application

The APA filing fee, which is payable when submitting the formal APA application, varies depending on the amount of the proposed covered transactions over the proposed APA term, as outlined below:

– Rs. 10 lakhs for international transactions up to Rs. 100 crores.

– Rs. 15 lakhs for international transactions up to Rs. 200 crores.

– Rs. 20 lakhs for international transactions exceeding Rs. 200 crores.

* No fee is specified for the pre-filing consultation process.

Reporting Requirement

Every person who has entered into an international or specified domestic transaction during a previous year must obtain a report from an accountant (CA) and furnish it electronically by 31st October of the relevant assessment year in Form 3CEB. This applies to all international transactions, irrespective of value, and specified domestic transactions if the aggregate value exceeds INR 20 crore.

An accountant’s report in Form 3CEB must be submitted along with the Income Tax Return, i.e., (on or before 30 November following the end of the relevant financial year). While taxpayers must maintain transfer pricing documentation beforehand, there is no obligation to provide this documentation along with the accountant’s report or Form 3CEB at the time of filing the tax return.

Penalty for Failure to Furnish Report:

If any person fails to furnish a report from an accountant as required by section 92E, the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty of one hundred thousand rupees.

Documentation Requirements as Per Indian TP Regulations

Taxpayers must annually maintain comprehensive information and documents regarding international transactions with associated enterprises (AEs) or specified domestic transactions.

Complete transfer pricing documentation, which encompasses an updated functional analysis and a recent economic analysis utilizing current data, must be maintained if the total worth of international transactions surpasses INR 10 million (approximately US$156,250) or the combined value of specified domestic transactions exceeds INR 200 million (US$3,125 million).

As per provisions in the Income Tax Act 1961, the following are the prescribed documentation:

Master File: According to section 92D, every constituent entity of an international group operating in India is required to maintain prescribed information and documentation.

The Master File (MF) should offer a summary of the multinational enterprise’s (MNE) business, including its global operations, transfer pricing (TP) policies, income allocation, and economic activities. The document is not meant to be exhaustive. Still, it will primarily cover the group’s structure, business description, intangible assets, financial transactions between group entities, and the MNE’s financial and tax positions.

Form 3CEAA Applicability in India:

Part A must be completed by every constituent entity. (*Constituent Entity of the International Group in India refers to any entity of the International Group in India whose accounts are included in the Consolidated Financial Statement.)

Part B applies to Group entities under the following conditions:

  1. Revenue threshold: Consolidated Group revenue exceeds INR 500 Crores.
  2. Transaction threshold:
    • International transactions exceed INR 50 Crores OR
    • Intangibles-related transactions exceed INR 10 Crores.

Due Date: Form 3CEAA must be filed on or before the due date for furnishing the return of income as specified under sub-section (1) of section 139.

Form 3CEAB Applicability in India:

Form 3CEAB provides a practical solution for international groups operating in India with multiple constituent entities. It allows the group to designate a single constituent entity to submit the mandatory Form 3CEAA to the tax authorities. This simplifies the process by eliminating the requirement for each entity to file separately. To utilize this option, the designated entity must inform the Joint Commissioner using Form 3CEAB at least 30 days before the deadline for filing Form 3CEAA.

CBC (Country-by-Country) Reporting: Section 286 mandates the reporting of aggregate information concerning various aspects such as revenue, profit and loss before income tax, income tax paid and accrued, stated capital, number of employees, and details of the primary business activities of each constituent entity.

To compile such a detailed report, the board must be engaged. Senior management must intervene early on to ensure compliance with regulations concerning the sensitive information that must be included in the report.

An inbound Constituent Entity (CE) is required to file a Country-by-Country Report (CbCR) in India under the following circumstances:

  • Parent Entity Obligation: If the parent entity is not obligated to file a CbCR for a reportable accounting year.
  • No Exchange Agreement: If there is no exchange agreement for CbCR with the jurisdiction of the ultimate or alternate reporting entity.
  • Systemic Failure Notification: If there has been a systemic failure in a jurisdiction, and this has been officially communicated.

In these cases, the inbound CE must fulfill its obligation to file the CbCR in India.

Information and Documents to be Kept and Maintained in Respect of International Transactions or SDTS:

  • An outline of the ownership structure of the assessee enterprise.
  • A summary of the multinational group to which the assessee enterprise is a part.
  • A general overview of the business operations of the assessee and the industry in which the assessee operates.
  • The nature and terms (including pricing) of international transactions or specified domestic transactions conducted with each associated enterprise.
  • FAR Analysis- Functions, Assets, and Risks Analysis.
  • Documentation of economic and market analyses, forecasts, budgets, or any other financial estimate. (Economic analysis should be conducted based on the chosen transfer pricing method.)
  • A record of uncontrolled transactions is used to analyze their comparability with the international transactions or specified domestic transactions entered into.
  • A record of the actual work carried out to determine the arm’s length price.
  • Any other information, data, or documents.

Penalty for Failure to Furnish Information or Documents:

The concept of contemporaneous documentation in transfer pricing regulations provides that information and documents should, as far as possible, be contemporaneous and available by the specified date, which is the due date of filing a return of income.

If a person engaged in an international or specified domestic transaction fails to provide the required information or document, the Assessing Officer, Transfer Pricing Officer, or Commissioner (Appeals) may impose a penalty of two percent of the transaction’s value for each instance of failure.

Conclusion

­­Transfer pricing is a critical and complex process that is covered under Sections 92 to 92F of the Indian Income Tax Act 1961. Different sections of the act cover both international and domestic transactions, as well as various types of taxpayers and their respective deductions, which are crucial parts of transfer pricing compliance.

Where Section 92F of the Income Tax Act covers Arm’s Length Pricing, Section 92C covers its methodologies, both of which are relevant to understanding how to prevent profit shifting. By understanding the various types, benefits, and processes of the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) in India, individuals and businesses can stay compliant with the transfer pricing rules and regulations.

At Mercurius, our dedicated team of professionals provides comprehensive support, covering all documentation, including Form 3CEAA and Form 3CEAB, along with country-by-country reporting.

For a more detailed discussion of specific transfer pricing rules or to obtain personalized assistance in domestic transfer pricing compliance, transfer pricing study, planning activities, and addressing and resolving intercompany transfer pricing issues, please contact us.

images

Ready to assist with any of your queries or concerns

images

Ready to assist with your Queries